I was with
my own toddlers in the park and mine was a warm to sultry autumn
afternoon, typical of that time of year in northern Italy. Around
me typical familial scenes between mothers and children (over
several generations, without fail) played themselves out around
me, against an aural backdrop of typically warm and sultry,
loud and unapologetic Italian verbiage: deep, dramatic, intense
and ordinary.
Now, I had come to Orwell by the circuitous
route of serendipity on the internet:
As a subscriber to Book2Book, I opened
an article headline and read a short, succinct and pointed
article by David Taylor on the pointless-ness of having an
opinion: in this instance it was in the context of the Iraq
war against an historical literary tradition of writers' opinions
having had some meaning, having carried some degree of socio-political
gravitas in the past: but now no more….
Mr Taylor's opinion hit several
nerve ends of mine which extend back into the socio-political
milieu of apartheid South African. So I answered him on the
given email address, thoroughly clueless then as to whom
in fact was at the receiving end. I am glad to say my response
was appreciated and so began an occasional genteel exchange
of mails: which revealed among other things, that there was
a reason I recognised the name: I had had my copy of his After
Bathing at Baxters stolen. He made mention of the imminent
release of Orwell and I got myself a copy, meanwhile discovering
I was exchanging tid-bits with no other than one of the 2004
Booker Man prize judges!: I fought one of those recurring
DNA freeze-drying overly-awed “ah-hah” moments
that have you neurotically scrumming your memory banks for
stupid, silly and inane comments you might have made along
the way….. breathlessly dreading the syntax, flow and
meaning of any sentence you might string together for his
mille-second attention the next time around…
And here I was opening the first pages
of his biography on George - one of the several that
Orwell had never wanted written, written by a short story
hero of mine, for whom Orwell had been a shadowy presence
ever since he(Taylor )had taken his first ever “adult
novel” off a bookshelf at home and began to read
A Clergyman's Daughter and means it deeply when I comments
indirectly how formed by Orwell he feels. I know the feeling
and the last thing one looks to find and never dares imagine
is that the perpetrator of such influence can be human contradictory
and of al things abhorred by those of us living it…ordinary.
Ordinary: It surfaces over and over
again as if by some fate of the Gods, dare not decree such
lowly status on the creative animal …. Even less on
creative artistic genius: literary in the specific here, “How
dare, one hears the echo holler, ” a man of such literary
stature dare be ordinary?”
It resounds off the pages I have read
in the meantime, of critique and critics critting critics… and
I am left with one singular impression: There is no substantive
impression by such people of real biography,
of the passion by author for his subject( however mixed the
feelings), or even for the man, the fallible human George
Orwell was…. But it is all hunger to tear at his posthumous
carcass for his lifetime crime of being ordinary to the latent
heat of being even, in ways, deadly dull and then even, with
mouths engorged with sated malice
turn to glut on the admirable literary
endeavour and commitment of its author…
I owe Mr Taylor more than a thank you
for an intriguing tale and a deeply fascinating read of a
man and his life beyond his pen and imaginings, but for leading
me into an incredible virtual labyrinth that is the cyberspace
dedicated to one man, his life and his work: it can only
be described as a thoroughly Orwellian experience!
So what is so terribly shameful is
being ordinary and dull I dare ask?
So what If George was not at his literary
romantic best on his deathbed when he proposed marriage:
at least he had the guts to…. And as much as I can
fathom
He entrusted his life's work
with one smart woman, despite the extent of the literary
chagrin it caused…. No woman out to purely exploit
a dead man's legacy would bother to commit the amount
of dedicated time of her own life, to custodial
editorship of her late husband's work and defend his
last will with Sonia's kind of fervour and rigor. Of
course the literary establishment hated it, ridiculed Orwell's
judgement and were likely eaten up with envy it had not been
one of them as the named custodian.
As for Orwell.The Life. I loved it.
I like the fact that Taylor isn't always blindly infatuated
with his hero: that there are moments within Taylor's
writing which even reveal possible dislike: it is healthy
and refreshing….as for the literary quality of the
book, being awarded the 2004 Pulitzer Prize for Biography,
says it all. Anything I add is superfluous. What I would
suggest is treating yourself to a read.
During our occasional exchanges the
launch of this magazine came up and David generously gave
me permission to reprint a post publication of his about his
feelings towards his subject and am please to include it in
this section.
In much the same vain, I am finding
my self increasingly addicted to the Orwellian world which
has unfolded out in front of me and to give you a taste of
what I am talking about….. take a look at these two
reviews and pay attention to the author names….
|